The Nature of Qualitative Studies

Merriam was required to perish across the world to Malaysia to conduct her theater of operations on how culture influences aged(a) crowings and identifies the level of learning that transpire. The cost involved in Americas (2000) claim was to a fault more expensive than the hire conducted by Distilled (2000), in addition, the sample coat utilise in Americas (2000) view was more diversified. Diesels (2000) make-up is much narrower and more conceded than Americas (2000) paper. Distilled (2000) limited her speculate to females only, contrary to How Cultural Values Shape acquirement in Older prominenthood The Case of Malaysia (2000) where both males and females were used.Divergences. The divergences Americas (2000) credentials argon holdd in her paper whereas, Distilled (2000) has no mention of her level of insure or education that supports her ability to conduct a valid study on her elect result. Professional literature follow Joined with individual(prenominal) cons iders of the exploreer is necessary for intricacy of the data. (Glasses, 1978). Although, Distilled (2000) did make mention that her research topic was selected because of the recommendations of former researchers. This statement alone gives merit to the contribution, need, and worth of research on her topic. Main Points.The main points of consensus in both papers is that ghostlike eudaemonia was extremely important to both study groups. Distilled (2000) indicated that her study groups spiritual breeding was not constant and varied from time to time. This is understandable since our environmental changes can persuade what is important and what is not as we go through life. Methodology. all hot research undertaking starts with a topic, chore, and area of interest, as tumefy as a paradigm. Crewel, 1998) Keeping this in mind, Merriam (2000) and Distilled (2000) both conducted their studies by exploitation the qualitative methodology.Perhaps since both studies were based on soc ial issues with populace from senior groups the qualitative methodology is the best for conducting interviews and surveys. Qualitative research is a study approach that is many times conducted by the human notion system. (Merriam, 2002) Merriam (2000) introduced comparisons between previous(a) adults in the Western to the easterly parts of the world. The determine from the West and the East were compared also with he Asian culture having a greater strike on being in harmony with nature, relationships and cooperation as one grows older, somewhat contrasting than that of Western counterparts.The Western senior citizen enjoys arguing and independence as they age. Findings from other studies show Westerners are more given oer to sickness and passive behaviors if they loose their independence. It is natural for an American to work in his/her senior years. Merriam (2000) says whether the older adults were from the East or the West, they were both concerned with their wellness and living conditions as they grow older. Also, the elders in the East take hook in being wiser with age. Some Simians believe in re-incarnation of the soul, where Americans believe in autonomy in human life.The setting of Americas (2000) study was in Eastern Malaysia where it was found to have a rattling diverse culture with Chinese, Indians and Malaysian. The variant cultures in Asia do not all have the same spiritual beliefs, but all appear to value spirituality, harmony, and family. Distilled (2000) conducted her study also utilise the qualitative research method. She used a 4. 5 3 min taped interview to gather data. The taped interviews were later write down for review and analysis. Diesels (2000) study population consist of 46 actors from various ethnic backgrounds.Diesels research study appeared to be theoretical with an intent to determine how the participants spirituality affect their chosen careers in education, in addition to, how they viewed knowledge and education . The vehicle which Distilled (2000) used for data analysis was the constant comparative method. (Merriam, 5998). Irishman (5993) tells us that Interviews are transcribed to best represent the dynamic nature of the living conversation. Purpose and Goals. The end of Americas (2000) study was to become more knowledgeable about the nature of how older adults in Eastern Asia gain knowledge.Merriam (2000) attempted to prove that cultural value are emotion-laden, internalized assumptions, beliefs, or standards that shop how we interpret our life experiences. The purpose of Diesels (2000) study was to look into the spiritual development of various cultural groups of women who choose adult education for social change and, how the association of their career fields direct them toward emancipators adult education practices. Data Collection. Americas (2000) study was conducted using descriptive and inductive qualitative research that directed on revealing the significance of participants o f the study.The chosen sample population in Americas (2000) study was 59 participants all over the age of 60 years old. Americas data was collected by person-to-person open-ended interviews in natural settings that lasted about one hour vast in two different languages. Merriam (2000) presented a demographic profile of her participants that was very helpful in seeing the overall picture in regard to ethnic group, age, sex, work experience and education. On the other hand, Distilled (2000) did not include visuals in her research paper. Data analysis from Americas (2000) study was completed in accordance with the constant comparative method (Merriam, 6998).Americas (2000) three themes in findings were presented clearly, concisely, and to the point. all(prenominal) theme addressed the nature of learning for older Mainstay adults. (Merriam, 2000) Diesels (2000) study was conducted tit taped interviews of participants that were later transcribed for review and analysis. The analysis o f the apparitional Development and Commitments to Emancipators Education n Women Adult Educators for Social Change study was presented in a narration discussion forum with discussions describing each participants experience and character.Reported Findings. Merriam (2000) presented her findings in a narrative format under three different themes, I. E. informal and embedded in the concerns and activities of everyday life, learning is common, and learning is driven by spiritual and/or religious concerns. each theme was presented in detail to ensure the outcome of Americas (2000) study was soundless by any indorser. Diesels (2000) paper was also presented in a narrative format. I believe Diesels (2000) overall study including her conclusion is very rude and diminutive.Diesels (2000) findings conclude that there is a common thread between spiritual development, and Emancipators adult education efforts. Structure. The common structure shared by both papers is qualitative research narrative formatted with common titles. Each paper presented an introduction, purpose, literature review, discussion, findings, methodology, resulting themes, conclusions and references. Conclusion. With any good qualitative study, developing a fuss statement, a purpose statement questions is important.Both of the studies cited in this paper are good examples of qualitative research papers in may ways, penthouse, the research questions are not presented. Both studies present an characteristics of a qualitative study. Bogged & Bikini (1992) says participant observation and in-depth interviewing are the most common data collection techniques. However, the conundrum statements from both studies are extremely vague. According to Christensen, et al. (2011) the characteristics of a good conundrum statement are Where applicable the variables in a research chore should express a relationship.The statement of the robber states the rationale for the study. The statement of the problem sh ould be testable. A problem statement should guide a reader from a common perspective to a believed problem followed by a solution. In addition, I believe the study group selected by Distilled may be scrutinized because 86 is not good representation of all Women Adult Educators. In closing with a positive note, both Distilled (2000) and Merriam (2000) gave reference work where credit was due by appropriately citing references, since any researcher knows plagiarism is inexcusable in the academic world.