Policies to Reduce Pollution

The two policies that ar mostly used to compress pollution ar the taxation of the pollution bring aboutrs (Pigovian tax) and standards-change approaches. The Pigovian taxes are usually broadly speaking levied as an excise tax, which lead raise the price of the goods produced. This grows the company to produce less(prenominal) which in turn lowers pollution.The standards-charge approach is to tax the pollution directly. The authorities determines the level of pollution that it thinks is appropriate, and then bequeath charge a comely for each unit that is above the appropriate amount. This is how the standard-charge approach rewards the companies that produce less pollution and punishes the companies that exceed the allotted pollution amount. unfortunately, standard-charge approaches dont alter policy makers to control the air reference. The establishment has to estimate how much a company pass on degrade their pollution when they are fined. If the disposal sets a fine to low, the company may determine that it is cheaper to pay the fines rather than dress its pollution. This also will not give the company an incentive to reduce their pollution level below what the government has set as the coveted limit.The positive benefits to these measures are that our ecosystems are wellnessier and this also helps the health of the bulk living in the local environment. Air pollution is known to cause a great deal of disease in the population, especially respiratory disease. The environments ecosystems will benefit when people and companies lower their use of fossil fuels, this will help to lower greenhouse gases.Taxes and fines always have some tell apart of losses involved, both to the companies and to the government applying the fines. When the different taxes are levied, companies will see to it ways to reduce costs by either cuts in staffing or outsourcing what they are able to send to foreign companies. Another cost involves the sorrow of the govern ment. The different taxes and fines levied on companies are paid over to the government and the government is notorious in their inefficiency in the use of their funds. Most government agencies are overly bureaucratic and cumbersome which can create unnecessary regulations that are impossible to enforce.It is impossible to determine the exact level of pollution drop-off needed to produce a healthier living environment. At this period in time, society controls the pollution levels until the costs outweigh the benefits of additional controls. This premiss isnt always valid. It has been proven, through past actions, which as air quality improves it becomes to a greater extent difficult to reduce the levels of pollution at a reasonable cost. Even though society demands a clean environment for health reasons, it is a higher concern depending on income levels.The higher the income level the more of a concern it will be. Those with a lower income that are without health check insurance are less inclined to worry about pollutions that will harm them over time. Pollution should be reduced so that it will not negatively affect the health of the population or the environment. Unfortunately we also have to weigh the lowering of pollution against the cost of concern loss and the cost of goods. In the end, as long as the government policies are able to reduce pollution to a level that is socially acceptable they can be viewed a success.