St. Anselns Ontological Argument For The Experience Of God :: essays research papers

St. Anselms ontological argument for the experience of idol.Gods surviveence may vary from philosopher to philosopher, but according to the belated St. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury there was absolutely no doubt that Gods forepart is certain, and yet the philosopher desires the realizeing of faith. As stated if god sensnot be thought process to exist, then whomever which may be conceived, only a fool would study that he God does not exist.Only a fool says from his or her heart there is no God, was the largest idea discussed in the presentation quoted by Anselm. It is one thing for an object to be in the brain, and another to understand that objects exist, he both, has it in has understanding and he understands that it exists because he has made it. thither is not a doubt that there exists a being, than which nothing great can be conceived. And it exists both in the understanding and in reality, then, so truly than a being which nothing greater can be conceived to exist, our God? If a mind could conceive of a being check then thee, the creature would rise above the Creator and this is absurd. God can be conceived to not exist but in the later, not at all. For example, no one who understands what God is can conceive that God does exist God is that than which a greater cannot be conceived. The nonexistence of that than which a greater cannot be conceived is inconceivable.Gaunilos argumentative criticism claims that in the dual existence, with understanding and in reality, for this reason it must exist. For if it does not exist, any lord who in reality exists will be more